UNIP Assets Battle Continues in Court

UNIP has submitted before the court that party secretary general Alfred Banda did not commit any perjury when he told the court that no party asset has been sold by the leadership.

Party administrative secretary Welfare Mfune explained that all assets which were being referred to by the 11 UNIP members who have sued the party leadership do not belong to UNIP but Zambia National Holdings Limited.

In this matter, 11 UNIP members have sued party president Tilyenji Kaunda and three other party leaders for allegedly holding their positions as Members of the Central Committee illegally as their mandate expired in 2005.

Fackson Njovu and 10 others are seeking, among others, an injunction to restrain Kaunda and the others from performing functions of MCCs, an order for an account of all party assets sold from 2000 to date and an order that the outgoing MCCs and the recognised interim MCCs follow the Registrar of Societies directive to jointly organise and hold a congress by forming one working group.

Njovu also cited UNIP vice president Njekwa Anamela, Banda and  Mfune, on behalf of 10 other party members.

Last year, Lusaka High Court judge Wilfred Muma restrained Kaunda and his group from performing any functions of the party until the determination of the matter.

In an affidavit in support of notice of intention to raise preliminary issues, Banda, the party secretary general, claimed that the lead plaintiff in the matter, Fackson Njovu, is no longer a member of UNIP as he defected to the MMD after he sold a party building in Chaisa and he never applied for re-admission to the party.

Banda further claimed that the other plaintiffs were also not genuine members of UNIP as they had been moving from one party to another, especially the ruling parties of the time, while others were not in good standing with the party due to various disciplinary cases at different levels of the party structure.

However, in a further affidavit in opposition to notice of intention to raise a preliminary issues and in support of ex-parte summons for an order of interim injunction and affidavit verifying facts, Njovu and others urged the court not to entertain the preliminary issue raised by Banda.

They added that the preliminary issue was aimed at frustrating a genuine claim by the members of UNIP before court.

Njovu further argued that the defendants committed perjury in the affidavit in reply when Banda stated that no party asset had been sold.

He added that the defendants had sold the party assets without approved 2/3 of congress and contrary to the UNIP constitution.

Njovu stated further that on December 6, last year, the defendants assigned UNIP property No. Kabw632 to Iqbal Akubat and the said property was sold at K700, 000.

He further alleged that on March 30, 2017, the defendants through Zambia National Holdings Limited, a company owned by UNIP, sold property No LUS/4870 to Kamrul Ahsa.

Njovu also alleged, among others, that the defendants, on behalf of UNIP, received motor vehicle donations for campaigns and some were placed under the custody of the company incorporated as Kwenda Zambia Car Hire Limited, but all have been sold without an account.

He stated that Mr Anamela and Mr Mfune were directors and holders of shares on behalf of UNIP in Zambia National Holdings Limited.

But in an affidavit in reply, Mr Mfune who is UNIP administrative secretary, disputed the claims by the plaintiff, stating that the defendants have not sold any assets of UNIP without the approved two thirds consent of congress.

He further stated that the property sold by the Zambia National Holdings Limited where the defendants were only shareholders, did not belong to UNP but to the same company, which was the legal owner.

Mfune denied that he and Mr Anamela have shares in Zambia National Holdings Limited on behalf of UNIP, but that they were shareholders in their own right and were not the only shareholders in the said company.

He also disputed the other claims by Njovu, stating that the plaintiff had failed to indicate what type and how many vehicles were received on behalf of UNIP and that there was no document to show that the shares in Kwenda Zambia Car Hire Limited were held on behalf of UNIP.


  1. Razor

    Zambia national holdings was a unip company and these people are just using it as a vehicle to sale all unip assets without the need of going through a unip Congress which would require a two thirds majority to sell any asset and also require for them to account for the funds received.

    • Joseph zulu

      Unip Leaders are there to eat resources not on leadership they’ think other people are not Wise please people continue challenging timyenji and group.

  2. people

    just sell everything and close the party

    • Shu Shu Shu

      UNIP will come back as the ruling party in Zambia because the other parties are full of tribalists who cannot govern this country

  3. Kasamwa Fwati

    We are Now regretting voting You out of Power ….

  4. Eye on politics

    Ngamwaliwa mwaliwa stop waisting ballot papers for able readers…..just share what you have and close that old school party for old people ala UNIP WITH WHO TWALIMITENDWA TAMWAKATEKEPO FUTCHI

  5. SEER 1 MIND


  6. Fungwe

    This Unip is a Nashala neka party.

  7. Emmanuel

    They know for sure that they cannot form government, their battle is about wealth. The same applies to MMD , these parties have properties the reason they fight for leadership. In developed countries and few countries in African political parties never dies and assets are maintained.

  8. Nshilimubemba

    Yes principles do not die, but the only problem is Zambia is now democracy with many parties competing.
    UNIP must rebrand it self to sense the present political climate.
    I would like to see UNIP to have seats in parliament.

  9. Ray Neil Nelson

    I wish UNIP governce was copied by these petty parties ruling us with no direction.

Comments are closed.